Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S219 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1200 APPLICANT S219 OF 2002 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ANOR N255 OF 2003 EMMETT J 6 JUNE 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N255 OF 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S219 OF 2002
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 JUNE 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application be dismissed pursuant to O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules 2. the first applicant pay the second respondent's costs 3. the second respondent notify the first applicant at his last known address of these Orders and the terms of O 35 r 7(2)(a) of the Federal Court Rules. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N255 OF 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S219 OF 2002
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE: 6 JUNE 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This matter was commenced in the High Court and was remitted to this Court by order of Gaudron J on 6 February 2003. At that stage, the applicant was represented by Adrian Joel & Co, solicitors. On 24 April 2003, Adrian Joel & Co filed a notice of withdrawal together with an affidavit in support of that notice. That affidavit disclosed that the latest address of the applicant known to the solicitors was 24/1074 Botany Road, New South Wales, 2019. 2 On 28 April 2003 the solicitors for the second respondent, the Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs ('the Minister') were informed by an officer of the Minister's department that the most recent addresses held by the department for the applicant were PO Box K552, Haymarket, New South Wales, 2000 and 32 Station Street, Dapto, New South Wales, 2530. 3 The matter came before me for directions on 2 May 2003 when there was no appearance for the applicant. On 9 May 2003, I stood the matter over for further directions today. On 20 May 2003, letters were addressed to the applicant at the three addresses that I have mentioned. The letters drew attention to the directions hearing fixed for today and the need for an appearance by the applicant. There was no appearance for the applicant when the matter was called today and the Minister seeks an order for summary dismissal of the proceeding under O 10 r 3(2) of the Federal Court Rules. In the circumstances, I consider it is appropriate to make such an order. I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate