Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Universal Music Australia Pty Limited v Brown [2003] FCA 1213
CORPORATIONS – statutory demands – application to set aside – whether defect causative of substantial injustice – whether some other reason why demands should be set aside – failure to identify debt – history of proceedings of failure to particularise claim
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 459H, 459G, 459J(1)(a), 459J(1)(b), 459J(2) Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd (1997) 76 FCR 452 applied Delta Beta Pty Ltd v Everhard Vissers (1996) 20 ACSR 583 cited Kalamunda Meat Wholesalers Pty Ltd v Reg Russell & Sons Pty Ltd (1994) 51 FCR 446 cited Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council v Four Seasons Constructions Pty Ltd (2002) 20 ACLC 352 cited Moutere Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 34 ACSR 533 applied UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED v ROBERT GEOFFREY BROWN W3008 of 2003 CENTENARY AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED v ROBERT GEOFFREY BROWN W3009 of 2003 RD NICHOLSON J 31 OCTOBER 2003 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W3008 OF 2003
W3009 OF 2003
BETWEEN: W3008 of 2003
UNIVERSAL MUSIC AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 158 592)
PLAINTIFF
W3009 of 2003
CENTENARY AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 085 156 216)
PLAINTIFF
AND: ROBERT GEOFFREY BROWN
DEFENDANT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 OCTOBER 2003
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. In matter W3008 of 2003: a. The statutory demand dated 26 March 2003 served on the plaintiff on 31 March 2003, purportedly amended on 10 April 2003 and re-served on 14 April 2003, be set aside. b. The purported amended statutory demand dated 10 April 2003 and re-served on 14 April 2003 be set aside. c. The defendant's notice of motion dated 9 May 2003, his amended notice of motion dated 12 May 2003 and his further notice of motion filed 8 August 2003 be refused. d. The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs (including reserved costs) of the application. 2. In matter W3009 of 2003: a. The statutory demand dated 26 March 2003 served on the plaintiff on 31 March 2003, purportedly amended on 10 April 2003 and re-served on 14 April 2003, be set aside. b. The purported amended statutory demand dated 10 April 2003 and re-served on 14 April 2003 be set aside. c. The defendant's notice of motion dated 9 May 2003, his amended notice of motion dated 12 May 2003 and his further notice of motion filed 8 August 2003 be refused. d. The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs (including reserved costs) of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate