Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commonwealth of Australia v Lyon [2003] FCA 1215 Re Robins; ex parte West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1999) 20 WAR 511 cited Cachia v Isaacs (1985) 3 NSWLR 366 cited Miller v University of New South Wales (2003) 200 ALR 565 cited Lambidis v Commissioner of Police (1995) 37 NSWLR 320 cited Tien Tran v Magistrates Court of Victoria [1998] 4 VR 294 cited Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Poompiriyapinte (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Badgery-Parker J, 28 August 1990) cited Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 considered COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE v PAUL LYON & FRANK PATRICK BARBARO & ARTHUR JOSEPH LOVEDAY & JOSEPH ALEXANDER CASSAR & FRANK VELARDI & PETER PANGELLO & ROBERT IBRAHIM & AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION & SEVEN NETWORK PTY LTD & NINE NETWORK PTY LTD & JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD & NEWS LIMITED N 1447 of 2003 MOORE J SYDNEY 30 OCTOBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1447 OF 2003
BETWEEN: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
FIRST APPLICANT
COMMISSIONER OF THE AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: PAUL LYON
FIRST RESPONDENT
FRANK PATRICK BARBARO
SECOND RESPONDENT
ARTHUR JOSEPH LOVEDAY
THIRD RESPONDENT
JOSEPH ALEXANDER CASSAR
FOURTH RESPONDENT
FRANK VELARDI
FIFTH RESPONDENT
PETER PANGALLO
SIXTH RESPONDENT
ROBERT IBRAHIM
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
SEVEN NETWORK PTY LTD
NINTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate