Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicants S61 of 2002 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1274 MIGRATION – affirmation by Refugee Review Tribunal of decision refusing to grant protection visas – applicants husband and wife Brahmin Hindus and their infant child – claim of well-founded fear of persecution on grounds of religion, political opinion and membership of a particular social group – marriage of two Brahmin Hindus sharing same ancestral name –non-sending by Departmental Secretary to Registrar of Tribunal of certain documents referred to in Decision Record of Minister's delegate – non-production of documents before Court – whether non-production should tell against Minister – whether it should be inferred against Minister that a document not produced contained information favourable to applicants' case – onus of proof – whether Tribunal had failed to comply with s 424 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by failing to refer to two books in its library which were likely to contain relevant country information.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 418(3), 424 Muin v the Refugee Review Tribunal and Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 190 ALR 601 distinguished Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502 cited Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 cited NAFF of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 52 cited Ayan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 139 cited WACO v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 171 cited Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589 cited Somanader v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 178 ALR 677 cited BC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 67 ALD 60; on appeal [2002] FCAFC 221 cited Thayananthan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003]FCA 1054 cited Re Ruddock; Ex parte LX [2003] FCA 561 cited Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 distinguished
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate