Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dowdell v Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1276
COSTS – multi respondents – costs against former parties Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Dowdell v Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 851 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) (1986) ATPR 40-748 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Dansk Rekylriffel Syndikat Aktieselskab v Snell [1908] 2 Ch 127 Thorpe Nominees Pty Ltd v Henderson & Lahey [1988] 2 Qd R 216 Knight v F.P. Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 Trade Practices Commission v Nicholas Enterprises Pty Ltd (1979) 28 ALR 201 R Quick, Quick on Costs, Lawbook Co, Sydney, 2001, vol 2
JOANNE DOWDELL v KNISPEL FRUIT JUICES PTY LTD (trading as Nippys) ACN 007 841 492 and Ors S 20 OF 1999 SELWAY J 11 NOVEMBER 2003 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 20 OF 1999
BETWEEN: JOANNE DOWDELL
APPLICANT
AND: KNISPEL FRUIT JUICES PTY LTD (trading as Nippys)
ACN 007 841 492
RESPONDENT / CROSS-CLAIMAINT
NIPPY'S WAIKERIE PRODUCERS PTY LTD
ACN 008 038 195
FIRST CROSS-RESPONDENT
PETER CONSTAS
SECOND CROSS-RESPONDENT
THEO CONSTAS
THIRD CROSS-RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SELWAY J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 NOVEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS: 1. Save only for the costs the subject of order 2, Peter Constas and Theo Constas shall pay the costs of the respondent Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd in the proceedings for which judgment was given in Dowdell v Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 851. Such costs are inclusive of such future costs in relation to the cross-respondents (or any of them) as may reasonably be incurred by Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd in relation to the assessment of damages pursuant to par 6 of the order made on 13 August 2003. 2. In relation to the issue of the extent of any damages suffered by the respondent: (a) Peter Constas and Theo Constas shall pay to the respondent Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd 50 per cent of the costs of the respondent; and (b) American Home Assurance Company, AMP General Insurance Ltd and CGU Insurance Ltd shall pay to the respondent Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd 50 per cent of the costs of the respondent. 3. Peter Constas and Theo Constas shall pay the costs of the first cross-respondent Nippy's Waikerie Producers Pty Ltd in the proceedings for which judgment was given in Dowdell v Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 851. 4. In each instance the costs ordered to be paid do not include any costs incurred by any party in relation to the claim by Knispel Fruit Juices Pty Ltd against the Citrus Marketing Board or the claims by Nippy's Waikerie Producers Pty Ltd against American Home Assurance Company, AMP General Insurance Ltd and CGU Insurance Ltd. 5. Costs to be taxed in the absence of agreement. 6. The parties be at liberty to apply upon reasonable notice. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in O 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate