Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v FFE Building Services Limited [2003] FCA 1294 AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v FFE BUILDING SERVICES LIMITED (formerly Chubb Building Services Ltd) (formerly James Hardie Building Services P/L) t/as Fire Fighting Enterprises, TYCO AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (formerly Wormald Australia Pty Ltd) t/as Wormald Fire Systems, PREMIER FIRE PROTECTION (NSW) PTY LTD, METROPOLITAN FIRE SYSTEMS PTY LTD, ALLEN EDWARD SMITH, COLIN SIMPSON, VITO FODERA, JAMES BELL, ALLAN CARR, MITCHELL GRICE and BILL LAWSON N 509 of 2002 WILCOX J 13 NOVEMBER 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 509 of 2002
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: FFE BUILDING SERVICES LIMITED (formerly Chubb Building Services Ltd) (formerly James Hardie Building Services P/L) t/as Fire Fighting Enterprises
FIRST RESPONDENT
TYCO AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (formerly Wormald Australia Pty Ltd) t/as Wormald Fire Systems
SECOND RESPONDENT
PREMIER FIRE PROTECTION (NSW) PTY LTD
THIRD RESPONDENT
METROPOLITAN FIRE SYSTEMS PTY LTD
FOURTH RESPONDENT
ALLEN EDWARD SMITH
FIFTH RESPONDENT
COLIN SIMPSON
SIXTH RESPONDENT
VITO FODERA
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
JAMES BELL
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
ALLAN CARR
NINTH RESPONDENT
MITCHELL GRICE
TENTH RESPONDENT
BILL LAWSON
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 NOVEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate