Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Filimoehala v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1305 IMMIGRATION – interlocutory application to prevent removal pending special leave to appeal to the High Court – application for exercise of Ministerial discretion under s 417 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – delay of four and a half years in processing applications for bridging visas – daughter obtained Australian citizenship – s 198(6) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – duty to remove imperative – where no valid application for any substantive visa – cogent grounds for exercise of Ministerial discretion – application dismissed Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth) s 10 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) NANO v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 205 referred to Jennings Constructions Ltd v Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd (No 1) (1986) 161 CLR 681 followed M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 199 ALR 290 followed
LATAKITUAKOLO FILIMOEHALA and OFA KILISITINA FILIMOEHALA v
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
N 1695 OF 2003
TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
14 NOVEMBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1695 OF 2003
BETWEEN: LATAKITUAKOLO FILIMOEHALA
FIRST APPLICANT
OFA KILISITINA FILIMOEHALA
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 NOVEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application be dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate