Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rafaraci v Pearce & Heers [2003] FCA 1307 BANKRUPTCY - Creditor's Petition - Bankruptcy Notice - application under s 153B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) to have Sequestration Order annulled - improper service of District Court Statement of Claim giving rise to judgment debt - improper service of Bankruptcy Notice and Creditor's Petition - s 153B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) not limited to circumstances where there has been an abuse of process - broad discretion - Sequestration Order set aside due to non-receipt of originating process.
Bankruptcy Act 1996 (Cth) s 153B Bankruptcy Rules Federal Court Rules Willshire-Smith Re; Ex parte Randle & Taylor Services Pty Ltd (1994) 48 FCR 371 at 374-5 followed Craig v Kanssen [1943] KB 256 followed Re Marsh; Ex parte Marsh v Paramount Leisure Products Pty Ltd (1991) 32 FCR 482 followed Hill v BP Australia Ltd [1998] FCA 1303 followed William v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 followed Zodiac Investment Pty Ltd v Brelsford (A Bankrupt) [1999] FCA 1582 followed Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1984) 154 CLR 589 followed Edelsten v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1989) 86 ALR 257 followed Henrich v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2003] FCA 539 followed Cottrell v Wilcox [2002] FCA 1115 followed VINCENZO RAFARACI v PEARCE & HEERS, INSOLVENCY ACCOUNTANTS AND SHOP-A-DOCKET PTY LTD N 7310 OF 2003 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 14 NOVEMBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7310 OF 2003
IN THE MATTER OF VINCENZO RAFARACI
BETWEEN: VINCENZO RAFARACI
APPLICANT
AND: PEARCE & HEERS
INSOLVENCY ACCOUNTANTS
FIRST RESPONDENT
SHOP-A-DOCKET PTY LTD
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 NOVEMBER 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate