Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Haynes v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1332 MIGRATION – judicial review – natural justice – cancellation of visa – failure to pass character test – pre-decision invitation to put submissions – supporting submission from de facto partner – whether information as to relationship given to departmental officer – alleged failure to include such information in issues paper to Minister – whether failure to take information into account – whether misdirection as to address to send supporting submissions – on facts no breach of natural justice – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1939 (Cth) s 39B S157 of 2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 cited STEPHAN WILBUR HAYNES v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W115 OF 2003 FRENCH J 19 NOVEMBER 2003 MELBOURNE (Heard in Perth)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W115 OF 2003
BETWEEN: STEPHAN WILBUR HAYNES
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 NOVEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (Heard in Perth)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W115 OF 2003
BETWEEN: STEPHAN WILBUR HAYNES
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE: 19 NOVEMBER 2003
PLACE: MELBOURNE (Heard in Perth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate