Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAVK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1389
MIGRATION – protection visa – confidential documents relied on by Refugee Review Tribunal – exercise of discretion under s 438(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) not to disclose confidential documents to applicant – advice from the Secretary of the Department of Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs disclosed to the applicant – request by applicant for the Refugee Review Tribunal to use the powers under s 427 to obtain answers from the Department to certain questions – whether failure to exercise powers under s 427 constitutes a denial of procedural fairness – whether the failure to disclose confidential documents constitutes a denial of procedural fairness
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 418, 424A, 427, 437, 438, 440, 474, 476
Gomez v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 190 ALR 543 cited NAAO v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 117 FCR 401 cited NAFQ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 473 cited WAGJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 277 cited NAVK v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N1127 OF 2003 EMMETT J 28 NOVEMBER 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1127 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NAVK
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 28 NOVEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application be dismissed; 2. the applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate