Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v The Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 1410
INCOME TAX – Determination under s 177F(1) of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – Whether Commissioner knew at the time of the assessment that the assessment was excessive because taxable income was overstated by him – Whether the Commissioner was bound in the circumstances to make a compulsory adjustment under s 177F(3) – Whether Commissioner was bound to issue an assessment for the bottom line amount – Whether assessment tentative or provisional – Whether assessment not made bona fide INCOME TAX– Whether open to the taxpayer to challenge the authority of the officer who made the determination under s 177F(1) JUDICIAL REVIEW – Whether s 175 and subs 177(1) protected the assessment in a proceeding under s 39B of Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – certified copy of the assessment produced pursuant to s 177(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), Part IVA, ss 177F, 177C, 177D, 177G Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Commissioner of Taxation v Stokes (1996) 72 FCR 160 applied R v Hickman; ex parte Fox (1945) 70 CLR 59 considered Asiamet (No 1) Resources Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2003) 196 ALR 692 followed Federal Commissioner of Taxation v S Hoffnung & Co Ltd (1928) 42 CLR 39 applied Batagol v Commissioner of Taxation (1963) 109 CLR 243 referred Henderson v Commissioner of Taxation (1970) 119 CLR 612 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Prestige Motors Pty Ltd (1994) 181 CLR 1 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Ryan (2000) 201 CLR 109 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Mochkin [2003] FCAFC 15; 2003 ATC 4,272 referred Dan v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2000 ATC 4,350 followed Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 applied Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 195 ALR 24 applied F J Bloemen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 147 CLR 360 applied Stokes v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 136 ALR 632 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Stokes (1996) 72 FCR 160 referred R v Commissioner of Taxation (WA); Ex parte Briggs (1986) 12 FCR 301 referred McCleary v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 97 ATC 4,266 referred Briglia v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2000 ATC 4,247 referred Madden v Madden (1996) 65 FCR 354 referred Sunrise Auto Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 61 FCR 446 referred Hoare Bros Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 62 FCR 302 referred Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 72 FCR 175 referred and distinguished Pickering v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 97 ATC 4,893 referred San Remo Macaroni Company Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 99 ATC 5,138 referred Commissioner of Taxation v Jackson (1990) 27 FCR 1 referred Metal Manufactures Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 99 ATC 5,229 followed Commissioner of Taxation v Australia and New Zealand Savings Bank Ltd (1994) 181 CLR 466 referred Kolotex Hosiery (Australia) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1975) 132 CLR 535 referred Kellow-Falkiner Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1928) 34 ALR 276 referred McAndrew v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 98 CLR 263 referred Meredith v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2001 ATC 4,595 referred Meredith v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 192 ALR 418 applied AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED (ACN 005 357 522) v THE COMMISSIONER OF V 547 of 2002 KENNY J 4 DECEMBER 2003 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate