Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McKenzie v Honourable Peter Slipper MP [2003] FCA 1416 MARK MCKENZIE v THE HONOURABLE PETER SLIPPER MP S 598 OF 2003 SELWAY J 8 DECEMBER 2003 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 598 OF 2003
BETWEEN: MARK MCKENZIE
APPLICANT
AND: THE HONOURABLE PETER SLIPPER MP
FIRST RESPONDENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SELWAY J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 DECEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant to pay the respondents' costs to be taxed in the absence of agreement. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 598 OF 2003
BETWEEN: MARK MCKENZIE
APPLICANT
AND: THE HONOURABLE PETER SLIPPER MP
FIRST RESPONDENT
THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SELWAY J
DATE: 8 DECEMBER 2003
PLACE: ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 Mr McKenzie, on behalf of the Kuyani people, has instituted proceedings under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) and s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) arguing that the issue of a certificate under s 24 Lands Acquisition Act 1989 (Cth) and the subsequent acquisition of land by the Commonwealth was invalid. For the reasons given in State of South Australia v Honourable Peter Slipper MP [2003] FCA 1414, I am of the view that the proceedings must be dismissed with costs. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Selway.
Associate: Dated: 8 December 2003 Counsel for the Applicant: J Basten QC with A Tokley and S Ower
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate