Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1494
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – where application seeks damages said to be the consequence of criminal conduct of Commonwealth employees – whether a general criminal statute permits a private right of action – whether application should be struck out as abuse of process Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 44 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 72 Criminal Code Act 1995 s 142.2, s 155.4 Federal Court Rules O 11 r 16 and O 20 r 2 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 followed O'Connor v S.P. Bray Ltd (1937) 56 CLR 464 followed Australian Iron & Steel Ltd v Ryan (1957) 97 CLR 89 followed Schiliro v Peppercorn Child Care Centres Pty Ltd No. 2 [2001] 1 QdR 518 cited Scultz v Schmauser [2001] 1 QdR 540 cited YUNCHANG TANG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND ETHNIC AFFAIRS No Q 27 of 2003 SPENDER J BRISBANE 16 DECEMBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 27 OF 2003
BETWEEN: YUNCHANG TANG
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SPENDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 DECEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Proceedings Q27 of 2003 are dismissed. 2. The applicant in those proceedings is to pay the costs of the respondent of the notice of motion to strike out those proceedings and of the application, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 27 OF 2003
BETWEEN: YUNCHANG TANG
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate