Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dresna Pty Ltd v Misu Nominees Pty Ltd [2003] FCA 1537
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – application for leave to amend – whether proposed further amended statement of claim discloses reasonable cause of action – whether failure to plead material facts – whether pleading embarrassing – whether leave should be refused on discretionary grounds TORT – tort of conspiracy – whether appropriately pleaded – requirement that conspirators intend to injure applicant – whether "target" too general – "unlawful means" conspiracy – whether breach of contract constitutes "unlawful means" – whether making of "false suggestion" to ACCC relevantly unlawful act – whether breach of undertaking given under s 87B of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) relevantly unlawful act – whether provision of false or misleading document to ACCC conduct "in trade or commerce" – whether conspiracy claim "mere surplusage" – whether unlawful act must itself be actionable – whether "unlawful means" must be same act for all conspirators
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 46, 52, 87B Patents Act 1952 (Cth) s 100(1)(k) Patents Act 1990 (Cth) s 138 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 136, 137 Federal Court Rules O 11, O 13 r 2(2) The Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 at 456 discussed Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Limited (1997) 189 CLR 146 applied Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 ChD 700 at 710 cited Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 at 91 applied General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 at 129 applied Prestige Group (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1990) 26 FCR 197 at 213-219 distinguished Lonrho plc v Fayed [1990] 2 QB 479 at 489-490 and 492 discussed Lonrho plc v Fayed [1992] 1 AC 448 at 470 discussed Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Limited v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 applied Mulcahy v R (1868) LR 3 HL 306 at 307 referred to Ahern v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 87 at 93 referred to Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1 at 108 referred to Quinn v Leathem [1901] AC 495 referred to Sorrell v Smith [1925] AC 700 referred to Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Co v Veitch [1942] AC 435 referred to Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No 2) [1982] AC 173 at 186 discussed Elliott v Seymour [1999] FCA 976 discussed McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 409 at 415-417, 435 discussed Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority (1999) 93 FCR 34 at 102, 104 discussed Metall und Rohstoff A.G. v Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc [1990] 1 QB 391 referred to Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd [1981] Com LR 74 discussed Grupo Torras SA v Sheikh Fahad Mohammed Al-Sabah [1999] All ER (D) 698 discussed Rookes v Barnard [1964] AC 1129 at 1204 referred to Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV v Export Credit Guarantee Department [1998] 1 Lloyds LR 19 at 32 referred to Yukong Line Ltd of Korea v Rendsburg Investments Corp of Liberia (No. 2) [1998] 4 All ER 83 at 98-101 referred to Michaels v Taylor Woodrow Developments Ltd [2001] Ch 493 at 503-511 discussed Surzur Overseas Ltd v Koros [1999] 2 Lloyds CR 611 at 616-617 referred to Fatimi Ltd v Bryant (2002) Aust Tort Rep 81-677 at [183] and [195] discussed National Phonograph Company v Edison-Bell Consolidated Phonograph Company [1908] 1 Ch 335 referred to Williams v Hursey (1959) 103 CLR 30 at 76-80, 104-108, 122 referred to Coal Miners' Industrial Union of Workers (WA), Collie v True (1959) 33 ALJR 224 at 227 referred to Gold Coast City Council v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd (1998) 157 ALR 135 at 150 referred to Vickery v Taylor (1910) 11 SR (NSW) 119 at 130-131 discussed Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (1993) 43 FCR 1 at 19 cited McWilliam v Penthouse Publications Ltd [2001] NSWCA 237 at [13] cited IMAC Security Services Pty Ltd v Tyco Australia Pty Ltd [2002] VSC 592 at [27] cited O'Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18 discussed Southan v Grounds (1916) 16 SR (NSW) 274 referred to Murphy v Farmer (1988) 165 CLR 19 referred to Musgrave v Martin [2003] FCA 920 referred to Joyce v Grimshaw (2000) 105 FCR 232 at 241-243 referred to Torquay Hotel Co Ltd v Cousins [1969] 2 Ch 106 at 139 referred to Davies v Nyland (1975) 10 SASR 76 at 96 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate