Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Carson v Comcare [2003] FCA 1550
WORKERS' COMPENSATION – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) upholding decision of Independent Review Officer refusing application for compensation in respect of permanent impairment – where appellant had made claim in respect of depression – where AAT found pre-existing impairment – where AAT had regard to materials not considered by primary decision marker - whether AAT committed error of law – appeal dismissed.
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) ss 24, 27, 28, 60, 62 and 64 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 40, 43 and 44
Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 24 ALR 577 cited Fletcher & Ors v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 84 ALR 295 referred to Commonwealth of Australia v Ford (1986) 65 ALR 323 referred to Re Flynn and Department of Aviation (1987) 13 ALR 279 referred to Re Costello and Secretary, Department of Transport (1979) 2 ALD 934 referred to Comcare v Fiedler (2001) 115 FCR 328 referred to Servos v Repatriation Commission (1995) 56 FCR 377 followed Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 cited PETER JOHN CARSON v COMCARE No S 396 of 2003 LANDER J ADELAIDE 22 DECEMBER 2003
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 396 OF 2003
BETWEEN: PETER JOHN CARSON
APPELLANT
AND: COMCARE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 DECEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal is dismissed. 2. The appellant is to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 396 OF 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate