Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Baird v State of Queensland [2003] FCA 1582 JAMES STANLEY BAIRD, MARIE CREEK, FRANK TAYLEY, HENRY WALKER, HENRY DEERAL, EDGAR IVAN GIBSON, ANITA KAREN GORDON AND ELLA WOIBO v STATE OF QUEENSLAND AND LUTHERAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA INC. Q 91 OF 2003 DOWSETT J 5 DECEMBER 2003 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 91 OF 2003
BETWEEN: JAMES STANLEY BAIRD
FIRST APPLICANT
MARIE CREEK
SECOND APPLICANT
FRANK TAYLEY
THIRD APPLICANT
HENRY WALKER
FOURTH APPLICANT
HENRY DEERAL
FIFTH APPLICANT
EDGAR IVAN GIBSON
SIXTH APPLICANT
ANITA KAREN GORDON
SEVENTH APPLICANT
ELLA WOIBO
EIGHTH APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
FIRST RESPONDENT
LUTHERAN CHURCH OF AUSTRALIA INC.
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 DECEMBER 2003
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicants pay the costs of the first and second respondents thrown away by the adjournment, which costs include the appearances in Cairns on 1 December 2003. 2. The applicants pay the costs of the first and second respondents of and incidental to their appearances today. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 91 OF 2003
BETWEEN: JAMES STANLEY BAIRD
FIRST APPLICANT
MARIE CREEK
SECOND APPLICANT
FRANK TAYLEY
THIRD APPLICANT
HENRY WALKER
FOURTH APPLICANT
HENRY DEERAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate