Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant S1599/2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2003] FCA 1607 APPLICANT S1599/2003 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ANOR N1414 OF 2003 EMMETT J 27 OCTOBER 2003 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1414 OF 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S1599/2003
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 27 OCTOBER 2003
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application be dismissed; 2. the applicant pay the second respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1414 OF 2003
BETWEEN: APPLICANT S1599/2003
APPLICANT
AND: REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE: 27 OCTOBER 2003
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 29 May 2003, a draft order nisi and affidavit were filed in the High Court of Australia, purportedly on behalf of the applicant. At that stage, the applicant was represented by Adrian Joel & Co, solicitors. However, the applicant voluntarily departed Australia on 10 April 2003. When the matter was called today, Mr Zipser of counsel, instructed by Adrian Joel & Co, appeared indicating that Adrian Joel & Co proposed to write to the applicant at his last known address seeking either instructions or indicating an intention to withdraw. 2 In the circumstances, there does not seem to be any point in that step being taken. It is appropriate that the matter no longer remain on the record. Accordingly, I propose to order that the application be dismissed and that the applicant pay the second respondent's costs. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate