FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NAPH v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1621 NAPH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N1517 OF 2003 EMMETT J 19 DECEMBER 2003 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1517 OF 2003 BETWEEN: NAPH APPELLANT AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENT JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE OF ORDER: 19 DECEMBER 2003 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the appeal be dismissed. 2. the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1517 OF 2003 BETWEEN: NAPH APPELLANT AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS RESPONDENT JUDGE: EMMETT J DATE: 19 DECEMBER 2003 PLACE: SYDNEY REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This matter was before Moore J for callover on 29 October 2003. On that day, the respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs ('the Minister'), asked for a direction that the appellant file and serve an amended notice of appeal setting out the grounds of appeal and the particulars of those grounds. His Honour directed the appellant to do so by 28 November 2003. 2 The reason for such a direction is patently obvious. The notice of appeal discloses no grounds and indicates no basis upon which the appeal could succeed. The appellant failed to comply with that direction and, on 10 December 2003, the appellant and the Minister were informed that the matter would be listed today for the purpose of hearing the parties on the question of whether to make an order that the appeal be dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth). 3 The appellant was unable to offer any explanation for his failure to comply with the direction, other than that he forgot. He was unable to formulate any grounds and said that, given time, he might be able to do so. In the circumstances, I consider that it is appropriate that the appeal be dismissed summarily. I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett. Associate: Dated: 23 January 2004 Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter Solicitor for the Respondent: Blake Dawson Waldron Date of Hearing: 19 December 2003 Date of Judgment: 19 December 2003