Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAVQ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 3 MIGRATION – where the Refugee Review Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs refusing to grant to the applicant a protection visa – whether the cumulative factual errors made by the Refugee Review Tribunal were of such a serious nature as to amount to a jurisdictional error – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal approached the assessment of the applicant's credit incorrectly
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusef (2001) 206 CLR 323 referred to Sivalingam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [1998] FCA 157 referred to Sivarasamoorthy v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) FCA 556 referred to Selliah v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999)FCA 615referred to SAAK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 191 ALR 663 referred to NAVQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N1426 OF 2003
HILL J 6 FEBRUARY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1426 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NAVQ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 6 FEBRUARY 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent Minister's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1426 OF 2003
BETWEEN: NAVQ
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate