Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
M162 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCA 23 MIGRATION – protection visa – application under s 75(v) of the Constitution for prerogative writs against the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs and the Refugee Review Tribunal – where application for mandamus and certiorari out of time – whether application had prospect of success – whether prohibition should be principal relief sought.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia 1901 (Cth): s 75(v) High Court Rules: O 55 r 17, O 55 r 30, O 60 r 6
Applicants M162 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1146, considered Re Ruddock; Ex parte Reyes (2000) 177 ALR 484, considered Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, followed Thayananthan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1054, followed Applicant S70 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1338, followed APPLICANTS M162 of 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS (No 2) V 305 of 2003 GOLDBERG J 29 JANUARY 2004 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 305 of 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: M162 of 2002
Applicants
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
First Respondent
MR GRAEME BREWER
AN OFFICER OF THE COMMONWEALTH IN HIS CAPACITY AS MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Second Respondent
MR STEVE KARAS
AN OFFICER OF THE COMMONWEALTH IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate