Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Were Securities Limited v Red Sheriff Limited [2004] FCA 42 WERE SECURITIES LIMITED V RED SHERIFF LIMITED & ANOR N 94 OF 2004 STONE J 2 FEBRUARY 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 94 OF 2004
BETWEEN: WERE SECURITIES LIMITED
PLAINTIFF
AND: RED SHERIFF LIMITED
FIRST DEFENDANT
RBC GLOBAL SERVICES AUSTRALIA NOMINEES PTY LIMITED
SECOND DEFENDANT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 30 JANUARY 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Upon Were Securities Limited, by its counsel, giving the usual undertaking as to damages, the first defendant be restrained until further order from holding any meeting of its Board to consider or vote upon any of the matters referred to in the affidavit of Richard John Flitcroft of 30 January 2004 at paragraph 17 at any time prior to Friday 6 February 2004; 2. The matter be stood over until 9.30 am on Thursday 5 February 2004; 3. Either party has liberty to apply on 24 hours notice; 4. Costs to be reserved. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 94 OF 2004
BETWEEN: WERE SECURITIES LIMITED
PLAINTIFF
AND: RED SHERIFF LIMITED (ACN 081 796 287)
FIRST DEFENDANT
RBC GLOBAL SERVICES AUSTRALIA NOMINEES PTY LIMITED (ACN 097 125 123)
SECOND DEFENDANT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE: 2 FEBRUARY 2004
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 30 January 2004 the plaintiff in this matter, Were Securities Limited ('WSL'), made an urgent application for interlocutory relief. It sought an order that the first defendant be restrained from holding a meeting of its Board of Directors at any time prior to 6 February 2004 to consider or vote upon certain matters that had been notified to WSL on 29 January 2004. Given the urgency of the matter, and being convinced that there was both a serious question to be tried and that the balance of convenience lay with WSL, I made orders without delaying to give reasons. It is appropriate that I now give these brief reasons for making those orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate