Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Northern Territory of Australia v Doepel (No 2) [2004] FCA 46
COSTS – application under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1997 (Cth) to review decision of Native Title Registrar as under s 190A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – Registrar decided to place application for determination of native title on Register of Native Title Claims – application to review decision unsuccessful – whether public interest or public importance warrants departure from ordinary rule as to costs – relevance of s 85A of Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 62, 85A, 190, 190A, 190B, 190C Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1997 (Cth) Native Title Amendment Act 1998 (Cth) Northern Territory of Australia v Doepel [2003] FCA 1384 cited Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 applied Ruddock v Vardalis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229; [2001] FCA 1865 followed Milne v Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania (1956) 95 CLR 460 cited Western Australia v Ward (2002) 76 ALJR 1098 cited Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58 cited Brownley v Western Australia (1999) 95 FCR 172; [1999] FCA 1431 applied Murray v Registrar of the National Native Title Tribunal [2003] FCAFC 220 considered NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA v CHRISTOPHER DOEPEL, ALAN YOUNG & BILL HARNEY D 17 of 2002 MANSFIELD J DARWIN 3 FEBRUARY 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NORTHERN TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY D 17 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA
APPLICANT
AND: CHRISTOPHER DOEPEL
FIRST RESPONDENT
ALAN YOUNG AND BILL HARNEY (ON BEHALF OF THE WARDAMAN, LIYI, YINGAWURNARRI AND NARRWAN GROUPS)
SECOND RESPONDENTS
JUDGE: MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 FEBRUARY 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate