Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2004] FCA 75
COSTS – application to amend pleadings withdrawn – whether costs should be ordered on an indemnity basis.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Amcor Printing Paper Group Ltd [2000] FCA 163, cited. Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd [2003] FCA 388 cited. SEVEN NETWORK LIMITED & ANOR v NEWS LIMITED & ORS N 1223 of 2002 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 12 FEBRUARY 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1223 of 2002
BETWEEN: SEVEN NETWORK LTD
FIRST APPLICANT
C7 PTY LIMITED
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: NEWS LIMITED
FIRST RESPONDENT
SKY CABLE PTY LIMITED
SECOND RESPONDENT
TELSTRA MEDIA PTY LIMITED
THIRD RESPONDENT
FOXTEL MANAGEMENT PTY LIMITED
FOURTH RESPONDENT
TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
FIFTH RESPONDENT
TELSTRA MULTIMEDIA PTY LIMITED
SIXTH RESPONDENT
PUBLISHING AND BROADCASTING LIMITED
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
NINE NETWORK AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
SPORTS INVESTMENTS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
NINTH RESPONDENT
NETWORK TEN PTY LIMITED
TENTH RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN RUGBY LEAGUE LIMITED
TWELFTH RESPONDENT
NATIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE INVESTMENTS PTY LIMITED
THIRTEENTH RESPONDENT
NATIONAL RUGBY LEAGUE LIMITED
FOURTEENTH RESPONDENT
FOXTEL CABLE TELEVISION PTY LIMITED
FIFTEENTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate