Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Preston v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCA 107 IMMIGRATION – judicial review – cancellation of visa – admissibility of ministerial reasons prepared months after decision – not admissible – whether irrelevant considerations – expectations of the Australian community – whether breach of natural justice – failure to invite comment on adverse material – failure to consider relevant consideration – interests of applicant's grandchild – no jurisdictional error – application dismissed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501, s 501G Preston v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 420 cited Shaw v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 203 ALR 143 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v W157/00A (2002) 203 ALR 5 cited Ayan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 196 ALR 332 Nezovic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2003) 203 ALR 33 cited Tuncok v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1069 cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 195 ALR 502 cited MARK LAWRENCE PRESTON v THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W62 OF 2003 FRENCH J 18 FEBRUARY 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W62 OF 2003
BETWEEN: MARK LAWRENCE PRESTON
APPLICANT
AND: THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 FEBRUARY 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate