Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 201
MIGRATION – application for General (Residence) (Class AS), subclass 801 visa (spouse) – application on basis that appellant suffered domestic violence – visa refused on ground that statutory declarations did not comply with reg 1.26 of Migration Regulations 1994 – requirements of reg 1.26 – whether statutory declaration of social worker set out opinion that appellant experienced fear or apprehension. NATURAL JUSTICE – denial of procedural fairness – whether Tribunal misled appellant – whether appellant's migration agent was led to believe by the Tribunal's conduct that the statutory declarations complied with the Regulations – whether such belief was reasonable. PROCEDURE – raising new ground of appeal. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(1A) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B(1) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 474(1) Statutory Declarations Act 1959 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), reg 1.22 –1.26, Schedule 2, cl 801, sub-cl 801.221 Alin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 979 applied Cakmak v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 257 followed Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 followed Dagli v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 298 cited Du v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1115 applied H v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 63 ALD 43; [2000] FCA 1348 followed Ibrahim v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1279 referred to Meroka v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 117 FCR 251; (2002) 70 ALD 298; [2002] FCA 482 discussed NAAV v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 123 FCR 298; (2002) 193 ALR 449; (2002) 69 ALD 1; (2002) FCAFC 228 cited O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310 followed Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S154/2002 [2003] HCA 60 applied VAAC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 74 followed Rajesh Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs V68 OF 2003 NORTH J 10 MARCH 2004 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate