Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zoia v Centrelink Employee Greg Hamilton [2004] FCA 271 PROCEDURE – failure to attend directions hearing in person or by telephone – prior advice from Registry of consequences of such non-attendance – prior adjournments – dismissal for non-attendance Federal Court Rules O 10 r 3(2) MR A ZOIA v CENTRELINK EMPLOYEE GREG HAMILTON W180 of 2003 ANGELO ZOIA v SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS TRIBUNAL W206 of 2003 ANGELO ZOIA v COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN W245 of 2003 RD NICHOLSON J 8 MARCH 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: W180 of 2003
MR A ZOIA
Applicant
AND: CENTRELINK EMPLOYEE GREG HAMILTON
Respondent
BETWEEN: W206 of 2003
ANGELO ZOIA
Applicant
AND: SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Respondent
BETWEEN: W245 of 2003
ANGELO ZOIA
Applicant
AND: COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN
Respondent
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: In W180 of 2003: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. In W206 of 2003: 1. The application be dismissed. In W245 of 2003: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
BETWEEN: W180 of 2003
MR A ZOIA
Applicant
AND: CENTRELINK EMPLOYEE GREG HAMILTON
Respondent
BETWEEN: W206 of 2003
ANGELO ZOIA
Applicant
AND: SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS TRIBUNAL
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate