Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Duncan v Hotop [2004] FCA 274 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5, 10(2)(b)(ii) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 50 Duncan v Hotop [2002] FMCA 56 affirmed Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Raptis (1989) 89 ATC 4994 cited Percerep v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 483 cited Sharp Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Collector of Customs (1995) 59 FCR 6 cited Tuite v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (1993) 40 FCR 483 cited IAN LAURENCE DUNCAN v ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR SD HOTOP, SENIOR MEMBER, ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL and THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES W170 of 2003 RD NICHOLSON J 22 MARCH 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W170 OF 2003
BETWEEN: IAN LAURENCE DUNCAN
APPLICANT
AND: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR SD HOTOP
SENIOR MEMBER
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
THE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant's application for an extension of time within which to file a notice of appeal be refused. 2. The applicant's application for a confidentiality order pursuant to s 50 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) be refused. 3. The applicant pay the costs of the first and second respondents of these applications. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W170 OF 2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate