Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wenkart v Pantzer (No 8) [2004] FCA 280 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – objection to jurisdiction – bankrupt applies for order compelling trustee in bankruptcy to call meeting of creditors to consider proposal by bankrupt under s 73 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – if proposal accepted by special resolution of creditors, bankruptcy would be annulled by operation of s 74(5) of Act – question of protection of trustee's entitlement to remuneration – question of Court's power under s 74(6) to impose terms and conditions on reverter of title of 'property of the bankrupt' to bankrupt on annulment – whether Court could make part of that property subject to a charge in favour of trustee as security for his remuneration – bankrupt and trustee compromise proceeding – as part of compromise bankrupt charges a particular property in favour of trustee as security for trustee's entitlement – meeting called, creditors pass special resolution accepting proposal, bankruptcy annulled – subsequent disputes between former bankrupt and former trustee – former trustee applies by motion in the proceeding for appointment of trustee for sale of the property charged – whether Court has jurisdiction to enforce the charge – whether it can do so by appointing trustee for sale. BANKRUPTCY – objection to jurisdiction – bankrupt applies for order compelling trustee in bankruptcy to call meeting of creditors to consider proposal by bankrupt under s 73 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – if proposal accepted by special resolution of creditors, bankruptcy would be annulled by operation of s 74(5) of Act – question of protection of trustee's entitlement to remuneration – question of Court's power under s 74(6) to impose terms and conditions on reverter of title of 'property of the bankrupt' to bankrupt on annulment – whether Court could make part of that property subject to a charge in favour of trustee as security for his remuneration – bankrupt and trustee compromise proceeding – as part of compromise bankrupt charges a particular property in favour of trustee as security for trustee's entitlement – meeting called, creditors pass special resolution accepting proposal, bankruptcy annulled – subsequent disputes between former bankrupt and former trustee – former trustee applies by motion in the proceeding for appointment of trustee for sale of the property charged – whether Court has jurisdiction to enforce the charge – whether it can do so by appointing trustee for sale. FEDERAL COURTS – objection to jurisdiction – bankrupt applies for order compelling trustee in bankruptcy to call meeting of creditors to consider proposal by bankrupt under s 73 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – if proposal accepted by special resolution of creditors, bankruptcy would be annulled by operation of s 74(5) of Act – question of protection of trustee's entitlement to remuneration – question of Court's power under s 74(6) to impose terms and conditions on reverter of title of 'property of the bankrupt' to bankrupt on annulment – whether Court could make part of that property subject to a charge in favour of trustee as security for his remuneration – bankrupt and trustee compromise proceeding – as part of compromise bankrupt charges a particular property in favour of trustee as security for trustee's entitlement – meeting called, creditors pass special resolution accepting proposal, bankruptcy annulled – subsequent disputes between former bankrupt and former trustee – former trustee applies by motion in the proceeding for appointment of trustee for sale of the property charged – whether Court has jurisdiction to enforce the charge – whether it can do so by appointing trustee for sale.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate