Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cottrell v Nicholls (Trustee) in the matter of Cottrell (Bankrupt) [2004] FCA 315 DAVID M COTTRELL v ALAN NICHOLLS (AS TRUSTEE IN THE ESTATE OF DAVID M COTTRELL A BANKRUPT) N 7880 of 2000 ALLSOP J 24 March 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7880 of 2000
BETWEEN: DAVID M COTTRELL
APPLICANT
AND: ALAN NICHOLLS (TRUSTEE)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 March 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pursuant to Order 35 rule 7(2)(e) of the Federal Court Rules order 2 made on 16 March 2004 in this matter be amended by replacing the date 19 September 2001 with the date 21 September 2001. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 7880 of 2000
BETWEEN: DAVID M COTTRELL
APPLICANT
AND: ALAN NICHOLLS (TRUSTEE)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: ALLSOP J
DATE: 24 MARCH 2004
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 27 February 2004 I made orders and published reasons in this matter. Later, on 16 March 2004 I made final orders. During the course of my reasons I attempted to set out, chronologically all that had happened, relevantly, in relation to the application. In [13] I indicated that on 19 September 2001 Conti J was once again heard the review from the orders of Registrar Tessoriero. That was accurate. However, in error, which was mine, I thereafter in the orders made on 16 March 2004 referred to the orders made by Conti J on 19 September 2001. While Conti J heard the matter on 19 September 2001, his Honour made the orders on 21 September 2001 which orders were entered on 7 January 2002. Thus, there has been an error by way of a slip and it is plain that my orders of 16 March should be amended such that order 2 should contain the date 21 September 2001 and not 19 September 2001. I will make orders accordingly. 2 The orders of the Court are that: 1. Pursuant to Order 35 rule 7(2)(e) of the Federal Court Rules order 2 made on 16 March 2004 in this matter be amended by replacing the date 19 September 2001 with the date 21 September 2001.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate