Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gherga v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 351 MIGRATION – visas – refusal to grant partner visa – decision made in excess of jurisdiction - application of Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Reg 1.15A in determining whether there is a genuine 'married relationship' – whether applicants denied natural justice because failure of Migration Review Tribunal to respond to enquiry as to whether available witnesses would be needed – breach of procedural fairness amounting to jurisdictional error that would deny protection of s474 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether denial of procedural fairness deprived applicants of the possibility of a successful outcome – failure to consider a topic mandated by the Regulations Statutes Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 474, 362 Migration Regulations, 1994 (Cth) Sch 2, par 309; Reg 1.15A(1A), (3), (3)(c), (3)(c)(ii) Cases Broussard v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 21 FCR 472 Referred to Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1987) 14 ALD 291 Referred to Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v SGJB [2003] FCAFC 290 Referred to Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 Applied Re Phillip Ruddock in his capacity as Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S154/2002 [2003] HCA 60 Discussed Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 Applied
CORNELIU GHERGA and ELENA-LAURA GHERGA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
Q94 of 2003
KIEFEL J
BRISBANE
29 MARCH 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q94 OF 2003
BETWEEN: CORNELIU GHERGA and ELENA-LAURA GHERGA
APPLICANTS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate