Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Alsalih v Manager Baxter Immigration Detention Facility [2004] FCA 352 MIGRATION – Migration Act – Detention – Who has custody of detainees – Power to detain – Whether reasonable prospect of removal from Australia within a reasonable period – whether objective or subjective test – Evidence to be called – Habeas corpus – Whether Federal Court has jurisdiction to grant Habeas Corpus
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Judiciary Act, 1903 (Cth)
SHFB v Minister for Immigration and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 29 Kidman v Commonwealth (1925) 37 CLR 233 M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2003) 199 ALR 290 SAAK v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 4) [2004] FCA 104 NATB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 292 M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 199 ALR 290 Al Masri v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 192 ALR 609 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Al Masri (2003) 197 ALR 241 Al Khafaji v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1369 R v Home Department State Secretary; Ex parte Khawaja [1984] AC 74 Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre [1997] AC 97 Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36 Naumovska v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous (1982) 41 ALR 635 Re Stanbridge's Application (1996) 70 ALJR 640, 642-643 Phong v Attorney-General (Cth) (2001) 185 ALR 753, 761 [25] Lloyd v Wallach (1915) 20 CLR 299 R v Carter Ex parte Kisch (1934) 52 CLR 221 Re Superintendent of Training Centre at Goulbourn and Anor Ex parte Pelle (1983) 48 ALR 225 Ex parte Walsh and Johnson; In Re Yates (1925) 37 CLR 36 Bateman's Bay v Aboriginal Fund (1998) 194 CLR 247 R v Transport Secretary Ex parte Factortame [1990] 2 AC 85 Rankin v Huskisson (1830) 4 Sim 13 Nireaha Tamiki v Baker [1901] AC 561 M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377 City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 Prisoners A-XX Inclusive v State of New South Wales (1995) 38 NSWLR 633 Durham Holdings v NSW (2001) 205 CLR 399 R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox & Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 Park Oh Ho & Ors v Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 167 CLR 637 Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 Richardson v Forestry Commission (1988) 164 CLR 261 South Australia v Tanner (1989) 166 CLR 1 Sportodds Systems v NSW (2003) 202 ALR 98 Te v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 204 ALR 497 Haney v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1555 Agha v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 164 SPKB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 295
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate