Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WAJY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 355
MIGRATION – application under s 39B Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – application for judicial review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming decision not to grant protection visas – where Tribunal decision result of matter being remitted by Full Court for redetermination – where previous Tribunal had accepted many claims of applicant – where substance to the criticism that Tribunal approached applicant's claims with a negative assumption precluding the Tribunal from going on to look fairly at the particulars of the evidence – where applicant not alerted that Tribunal believed and would find collusion and rehearsing of evidence between applicant and applicant wife – where Tribunal should have made this clear to applicant
Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Applicant S20/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 198 ALR 59 referred to Kopalapillai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 547 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 210 CLR 222 referred to Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 followed WAJY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W 104 of 2003 MOORE J 31 MARCH 2004 SYDNEY (HEARD IN PERTH)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W 104 OF 2003
BETWEEN: WAJY
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MOORE J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN PERTH)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. A writ of certiorari issue to remove to this Court and quash the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal of 5 May 2003. 2. A writ of mandamus issue directing the Tribunal to determine according to law the applicant's application for a protection visa. 3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate