Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Black on White Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 363 BANKRUPTCY – trade practices – previous declaration that the third respondent was knowingly concerned in or a party to contraventions of the Trade Practices Act 974 (Cth) by the first respondent – third respondent ordered to pay $14,844.22 – scope of the Federal Court's power to set aside judgments of the Court – whether the "claims" against the third respondent in respect of which judgments had been given were "matters" provable in his bankruptcy pursuant to s 82(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – whether claims for damages under subss 87(1A) and (1B) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) are in the nature of unliquidated damages arising otherwise than by reason of a contract, promise or breach of trust
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 82 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) subss 87(1A) and (1B), ss 52, 51AB, Part IV Federal Court Rules, O 35 r 2, O 35 r 7(2) Taylor v Taylor (1979) 25 ALR 418 referred to Cameron v Cole (1944) 68 CLR 571 referred to Wentworth v Rogers (No 9) (1987) 8 NSWLR 388 referred to Wati v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 78 FCR 543 referred to Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 referred to Capital Webbworks Pty Ltd v Adultshop.com.limited (2002) 116 FCR 255 cited Marks v GIO Australia (1998) 196 CLR 494 cited Wardley Australia Limited v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 cited Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kritharas (2000) 105 FCR 444 considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Top Snack Foods Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-708 considered Fielding v Vagrand Pty Ltd (In liq) (1992) 39 FCR 251 referred to CCA Systems Pty Ltd v Communications & Peripherals (Australia) Pty Ltd (1989) 15 ACLR 720 cited Reid v Interarch Australia Pty Limited [2000] FCA 1328 cited Re NIAA Corporation Ltd (in liq) (unreported, Supreme Court, NSW, McLelland CJ, No 4480 of 1994, 2 December 1994) cited Vagrand Pty Ltd (In liq) v Fielding (1993) 41 FCR 550 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate