Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAYQ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 365
MIGRATION – Application for protection visa by Iranian national – Challenge to decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – Whether Tribunal denied procedural fairness to applicant – Whether Tribunal failed to consider all integers of applicant's case – Whether decision of Tribunal was manifestly unreasonable – Whether Tribunal's decision was based on findings of fact unsupported by evidence – Finding of Tribunal of 'increasing political liberalization' in Iran – Finding unsupported by cited country information – Decision set aside on this ground. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 420, 425, 425A, 477 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 4.35D(a) NAYQ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 2547 of 2003 WILCOX J 31 MARCH 2004 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 2547 of 2003
BETWEEN: NAYQ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 31 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. a writ of certiorari be issued quashing the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal, dated 10 July 2002, in relation to the applicant; 2. a writ of mandamus be issued directing the said Tribunal to rehear and determine, according to law, the applicant's application for review of the decision made in relation to him by the delegate of the respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; and 3. the respondent pay the applicant's costs of this proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate