Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAOI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 383 MIGRATION - protection visa application - appeal from decision of Federal Magistrate affirming Refugee Review Tribunal decision - fear of persecution for political opinion and religion - reasonableness of relocation within country of origin - adequacy of information put by the RRT member - no suggestion that appellant would have lead evidence to the contrary - procedural fairness - no evidence - country information - open to the RRT to make its findings - assessment of claim on cumulative basis - nature of persecution - "harm" - "serious harm" - appeal dismissed. Randhawa v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 referred to SBBS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 194 ALR 749 cited NAOI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 2554 of 2003 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 7 APRIL 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 2554 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT
BETWEEN: NAOI
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 APRIL 2004
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The appeal be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 2554 OF 2003
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT
BETWEEN: NAOI
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 7 APRIL 2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate