Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant A151 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 386 APPLICANT A151 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS; MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL; PRINCIPAL MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL S 720 OF 2003 LANDER J ADELAIDE 26 MARCH 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 720 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT A151 OF 2003
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 MARCH 2004
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant's application of 10 March 2003 remitted to this Court is dismissed. 2. The applicant to pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 720 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: APPLICANT A151 OF 2003
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENT
PRINCIPAL MEMBER, REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LANDER J
DATE: 26 MARCH 2004
PLACE: ADELAIDE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicant commenced proceedings in the High Court of Australia on 18 March 2003 seeking the issue of the constitutional writs directed to the Refugee Review Tribunal in relation to a decision made by that Tribunal on 16 August 2002. 2 On 11 June 2003 Hayne J, of the High Court, remitted the matter to this Court for hearing. 3 On 10 December 2003 Mansfield J made orders requiring the applicant to file a number of documents in support of the applicant's application. The applicant has not complied with Mansfield J's orders. 4 On 24 March 2004 the applicant's solicitor filed an affidavit in which she deposed to the efforts made by her to obtain instructions from the applicant. It seems that the applicant is unable to be contacted. It seems to me that the applicant has evidenced an intention not to proceed with the application and, in those circumstances, I make the following orders: 1. The applicant's application of 10 March 2003 remitted to this Court is dismissed. 2. The applicant to pay the first respondent's costs. I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lander.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate