Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VCAK OF 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs[2004] FCA459 MIGRATION- protection visa - application to review decision of the Tribunal - whether obligation to make reference to each Convention reason in Reasons for Decision - Tribunal did not invite applicant to comment on certain country information relied upon by Tribunal - whether such information required to be provided by s 424A of the Migration Act - whether the Tribunal under obligation to satisfy itself as to authenticity of documents - whether Tribunal under obligation to undertake further investigations - whether Tribunal failed to comply with s 430 of the Migration Act by not setting out all its findings on material questions of fact Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2), 65, 420, 420(1), 424, 424A, 425, 427(1)(d) and 430 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 followed Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 considered Dissanayake v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 976 applied Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2003) 197 ALR 389 considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 considered Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 applied Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Tedella (2001) 195 ALR 84 applied Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 followed Re Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 considered Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 considered SCAS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 598 followed SCAS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 397 followed Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 considered VDAU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 363 considered VEAJ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 678 considered VCAK OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS V 522 OF 2003 CRENNAN J 21 APRIL 2004 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate