Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Warrick [2004] FCA 488
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – federal jurisdiction – proceeding commenced in Supreme Court of State – recovery proceeding in federal jurisdiction – cross-vesting order made by consent in Supreme Court of State – signed and sealed by a Registrar – cross-vesting order took effect by operation of Supreme Court Rules – whether cross-vesting order validly made – held order validly made
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)
Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA) s 7, s 155, s 167
Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth)
Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (WA)
Supreme Court Rules O 43 r 16, O 81E
Zines, Federal Jurisdiction in Australia, 3rd Edition (Federation Press, 2002)
Commonwealth v Hospital Contribution Fund of Australia (1982) 150 CLR 49 cited
Kotsis v Kotsis (1970) 120 CLR 69 cited
Knight v Knight (1971) 122 CLR 114 cited
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v WAYNE PATRICK WARRICK
W46 OF 2004
FRENCH J
23 APRIL 2004
PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W46 OF 2004
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
APPLICANT
AND: WAYNE PATRICK WARRICK
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 APRIL 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. It is declared that these proceedings were validly cross-vested to this Court by the consent order made in the Supreme Court of Western Australia on 17 February 2004. 2. The costs of the directions hearing of 16 April 2004 and of the written submissions filed in relation to the validity of the cross-vesting order are costs in the cause. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate