Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Adrenalin International Powersports Pty Ltd v John Caines Management Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 506
PROCEDURE - application for stay of proceedings pending appeal – no evidence adduced that appropriate case for stay – application refused
Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 67 FCR 65, followed
ADRENALIN INTERNATIONAL POWERSPORTS PTY LTD v JOHN CAINES MANAGEMENT PTY LTD & ORS V190 OF 2003 MARSHALL J 26 APRIL 2004 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V190 OF 2003
BETWEEN: ADRENALIN INTERNATIONAL POWERSPORTS PTY LTD (ACN 089 178 594)
APPLICANT
AND: JOHN CAINES MANAGEMENT PTY LTD (ACN 006 050 666)
FIRST RESPONDENT
PENELOPE ROSEWARNE
SECOND RESPONDENT
LIAM ROSSNEY
THIRD RESPONDENT
PETER BENSON
FOURTH RESPONDENT
JIM KNIGHT
FIFTH RESPONDENT
AND: JOHN CAINES MANAGEMENT PTY LTD (ACN 006 050 666)
FIRST CROSS-CLAIMANT
PENELOPE ROSEWARNE
SECOND CROSS-CLAIMANT
LIAM ROSSNEY
THIRD CROSS-CLAIMANT
PETER BENSON
FOURTH CROSS-CLAIMANT
JIM KNIGHT
FIFTH CROSS-CLAIMANT
ADRENALIN INTERNATIONAL POWERSPORTS CENTRE PTY LTD
SIXTH CROSS-CLAIMANT
AND: DAVID ANTHONY ARNOLD
FIRST CROSS-RESPONDENT
RAYMOND JOHN SOLOMON
SECOND CROSS-RESPONDENT
BRUCE VIVIAN THOMAS
THIRD CROSS-RESPONDENT JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 26 APRIL 2004
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The respondents' and cross-claimants' motion of 26 March 2004 be dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate