Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kennedy v Baker [2004] FCA 562 CRIMINAL LAW – Crimes Act 1914 – Part 1AA – subs 3L(1A) – search and seizure – creation of copy of computer hard drive – removal of copy hard drive from premises – reliance on content of single computer file – whether conduct of executing officer authorised STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION – subs 3L(1A) Crimes Act 1914 – whether subs 3L(1A) authorised copying of hard drive of computer authorised – whether copying justified by reference to single computer file – construction of 'data' – data a singular collective noun – whether removal of copy hard drive a 'seizure' ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – executing officer – reasonable belief – onus of proof – whether reasonable grounds to believe computer file fell within warrant conditions LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE – s 3ZX Crimes Act 1914 – copying of computer hard drive under subs 3L(1A) – no opportunity to review contents of hard drive – whether reasonable opportunity to claim privilege
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 3C ‑ 3ZX Cybercrime Act 2001 (Cth) Sch 2 cl 12 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Adler v Gardiner (2002) 43 ACSR 24 considered Baker v Campbell (1983) 153 CLR 52 referred to Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1997) 188 CLR 501 cited Commissioner of Taxation v Citibank (1989) 20 FCR 403 considered Crane v Gething (2000) 97 FCR 9 cited Hart v Commissioner of Federal Police (2002) 124 FCR 384 considered Harts Australia Ltd v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (2002) 117 FCR 358 cited Hooper v Kirella Pty Ltd (1999); 96 FCR 1 referred to Jacobsen v Rogers (1995) 182 CLR 572 referred to K Mart Australia Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [1995] FCA 760 referred to Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCA 332 referred to Lai-Ha v McCusker (2000) 101 FCR 460 cited McGowan v Migration Agents Registration Authority [2003] FCA 482 referred to Mirvac Homes (NSW) Pty Limited v Airservices Australia (No 1) [2004] FCA 109 referred to Parker v Churchill (1985) 9 FCR 316 cited Question of Law Reserved (No 1 of 1998) (1998) 70 SASR 281 distinguished R v Fraser-Adams [2001] NTSC 32; 161 FLR 120 distinguished Saitta Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (2000) 106 FCR 554 referred to Salerno v National Crime Authority (1997) 75 FCR 133 referred to Truth About Motorways Pty Limited v Macquarie Infrastructure Investment Management Limited (2000) 200 CLR 591 cited Williams v Keelty (2001) 111 FCR 175 considered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate