Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Akpata v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 563 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – ss 501E, 501F(3) and 48A of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) challenged as being beyond the power of the Parliament – whether ss 501E, 501F(3) and 48A of the Act come within Parliament's power under s 51(xix) of the Constitution – whether ss 501E, 501F(3) and 48A of the Act confer judicial powers upon the Parliament – whether ss 501E and 48A of the Act are inconsistent with the Refugees Convention as amended by the Refugees Protocol and are invalid.
MIGRATION – whether ss 48A, 501E and 501F(3) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) within power – challenge to constitutional validity of those sections dismissed. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (Cth) s 51(xix) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 13, 14, 15, 36(1), 48A, 189, 196, 501, 501E, 501F(3) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4C Migration Legislation Amendment Act 1989 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Strengthening of Provisions Relating to Character and Conduct) Act 1998 (Cth) Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1986 (SA) Akpata v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 402 cited Akpata v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1868 cited Plaintiffs 157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 cited Akpata v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 389 cited Akpata v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 65 cited Pochi v MacPhee (1982) 151 CLR 101 applied Nolan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1988) 165 CLR 178 cited Milne v Huber (1843) 17 Fed Cas 403 referred to Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 176 CLR 1 followed Re Patterson: Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 applied Robtelmes v Brenan (1906) 4 CLR 395 applied The Queen v Kirby, Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254 cited NSW Bar Association v Stevens [2003] NSWCA 261 cited Polites v The Commonwealth (1945) 70 CLR 60 applied Horta v The Commonwealth (1994) 181 CLR 183 applied Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 cited Chow Hung Ching v The King (1948) 77 CLR 449 applied Bradley v The Commonwealth (1973) 128 CLR 557 applied Simsek v MacPhee (1982) 148 CLR 636 cited STEPHEN OGHO AKPATA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS S 595 of 2003 MANSFIELD J 18 MAY 2004 ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate