Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Energex Limited v Alstom Australia Limited [2004] FCA 575
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – application for summary judgment or strike out of statement of claim – whether allegations under s 82(1) of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) statute barred under s 82(2) – whether cause of action accrues at time agreement to purchase goods entered into, or when loss and damage discovered – whether limitation defence should be dealt with at interlocutory stage – whether allegations under ss 80 and 87 included in order to circumvent limitation period – whether those allegations fail to disclose cause of action, are frivolous or vexatious, or abuse of process – whether failure to plead essential elements of tort of deceit
WORDS & PHRASES – "in trade or commerce" – s 51AC of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether reliance upon limitation defence constitutes conduct in trade or commerce
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Pt IV and ss 45, 51AC, 80, 82, and 87
ACCC v ABB Transmission and Distribution Limited (2001) ATPR 41-815 referred to ACCC v ABB Transmission and Distribution Limited (2001) ATPR 41-839 referred to Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 referred to State of Queensland v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR 41-691 referred to Wardley Australia Limited v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 applied Arcadi v Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1984) ATPR 40-473 referred to Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum NL (1994) 179 CLR 332 referred to Torrens Aloha Pty Ltd v Citibank NA (1997) 72 FCR 581 referred to Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd v Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd (1988) ATPR 40-853 referred to Australian Iron & Steel Ltd v Hoogland (1962) 108 CLR 471 referred to Mayne Nickless Ltd v Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd (2001) 114 FCR 108 discussed Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 referred to Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378 referred to James v ANZ Banking Group Ltd (1986) 64 ALR 347 referred to Karedis Enterprises Pty Ltd v Antoniou (1995) 59 FCR 35 applied Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 referred to Jobbins v Capel Court Corporation Ltd (1989) 25 FCR 226 referred to ACCC v CG Verbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) ATPR 41-802 referred to Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd v TNT Australia Pty Ltd (1996) ATPR 41-522 referred to Sammy Russo Supplies Pty Ltd v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-641 referred to Western Australia v Wardley Australia Ltd (1991) 30 FCR 245 applied Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494 referred to I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109 referred to Cartledge v E Jopling & Sons Ltd [1963] AC 758 discussed Blacker v National Australia Bank Ltd (2001) ATPR 41-817 referred to Troulis v Vamvoukakis (unreported, NSW Court of Appeal, 27 February 1998) referred to Williams v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1999] NSWCA 345 referred to Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 referred to Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 discussed Brunninghausen v Glavanics (1999) 46 NSWLR 538 referred to Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 applied General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 applied Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 referred to McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 409 applied Bank Commerciale SA (In Liq) v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279 referred to Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd (2004) 204 ALR 26 discussed Little v Law Institute of Victoria & Ors (No 3) [1990] VR 257 applied Re Ku-ring-gai Co-operative Building Society (No 12) Ltd (1978) 22 ALR 621 referred to Australian Associated Motor Insurers Ltd v NRMA Insurance Ltd (2002) 124 FCR 518 referred to Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594 applied The Commonwealth v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 referred to Atlantic City Electric Co v General Electric Co 312 F2d 236 (1962) referred to Bailey v Glover 88 US 342 (1874) referred to Scarcella v Lettice (2000) 51 NSWLR 302 discussed Imperial Gas Light and Coke Co v London Gas Light Co (1854) 10 Exch 39; 156 ER 346 referred to Hunter v Gibbons (1856) 1 H & N 459; 156 ER 1281 referred to Armstrong v Milburn [1886-90] All ER Rep 596 referred to R v McNeil (1922) 31 CLR 76 referred to Metacel Pty Ltd v Ralph Symonds Ltd (1969) 90 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 449 referred to Gibbs v Guild (1882) 9 QBD 59 referred to Cubillo v Commonwealth (1999) 89 FCR 528 referred to Noble v Victoria [1999] QCA 110 referred to Director of Public Prosecutions v Ray [1974] AC 370 discussed Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate