Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Torning v Child Support Registrar [2004] FCA 631 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Notice of Motion seeking dismissal of an Amended Application under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) to restrain the Child Support Registrar from collecting amounts due and payable under statutory child support assessment scheme - Federal Court should exercise jurisdiction to review child support matters only in exceptional circumstances - statutory provision for comprehensive review rights at an administrative and judicial level - Constitutional validity of child support assessment scheme - Scheme not unconstitutional - Scheme not imposing a tax - Child Support Registrar not exercising judicial power - discretionary nature of relief sought - Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth) - Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) - Notice of Motion granted. Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 (Cth) Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Brock v Deputy Child Support Registrar (1995) 57 FCR 538 discussed Swan Portland Cement Ltd v Comptroller General of Customs (1989) 90 ALR 280 cited DuPont (Australia) v Comptroller General of Customs (1993) 30 ALD 829 cited Yarmirr v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1990) 96 ALR 739 cited Whittaker v Child Support Registrar [2003] FCA 1429 cited Whittaker v Child Support Registrar [2003] FCAFC 114 cited Luton v Lessels (2002) 201 CLR 333 applied RICHARD JOHN TORNING v CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR AND RACHEL JANE STEVENS N 2255 OF 2003 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 21 MAY 2004
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 2255 OF 2003
BETWEEN: RICHARD JOHN TORNING
APPLICANT
AND: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate