Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McVeigh, in the matter of J.A.G. Plastering & Carpentry Pty Ltd (in liq) v Commissioner of Taxation [2004] FCA 653
CORPORATIONS – winding up – liquidator seeking to recover unfair preferences – records of company – hearsay – presumption that liquidator obtained company's financial records
Bankruptcy Act 1924 (Cth) s 95 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)ss 558FE(1), 588FA(1), 588FE(2), 588FGA Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Part 2.2 Action Waste Collections Pty. Ltd. (In Liquidation), Re; Crawford v O'Brien [1981] VR 691 followed Calzaturificio Zenith Pty. Ltd. (In Liquidation) v N.S.W Leather & Trading Co. Pty. Ltd. [1970] VR 605 cited Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Limited (1983) 154 CLR 87 referred to Sandell v Porter (1966) 115 CLR 666 applied Walsh v Natra Pty Ltd [2000] 1 VR 523 cited
IN THE MATTER OF J.A.G. PLASTERING & CARPENTRY PTY LTD
(in liquidation)
DEAN ROYSTON McVEIGH AS LIQUIDATOR OF J.A.G. PLASTERING & CARPENTRY PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V 191 of 2004 FINKELSTEIN J 21 MAY 2004 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 191 of 2004
IN THE MATTER OF J.A.G. PLASTERING & CARPENTRY PTY LTD
(in liquidation)
BETWEEN: DEAN ROYSTON McVEIGH AS LIQUIDATOR OF J.A.G. PLASTERING & CARPENTRY PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION)
Plaintiff
AND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Defendant
AND BETWEEN: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Cross-Claimant AND: JOHN BRUNON PRUSZAK and
GINO BINDA
Cross-Defendants
JUDGE: FINKELSTEIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 MAY 2004
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT DECLARES THAT the payments made by J.A.G. Plastering & Carpentry Pty Ltd (in liquidation) to the defendant between 26 February 2003 and 9 May 2003 totalling $180,000 were unfair preferences pursuant to s 588FA of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and are void against the plaintiff pursuant to s 588FE of the Corporations Act. THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The defendant pay the plaintiff the sum of $180,000. 2. The cross respondents pay the plaintiff's costs of the day. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate