Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Pasminco Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) (No 2) [2004] FCA 656 CORPORATIONS – deed of company arrangement – administrator's discretion – directions sought by administrator – whether administrator can surrender discretion to court PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – deed of company arrangement – variation by court order – whether creditors need to be joined
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 447A, 447D Law of Property and Trustees Relief Amendment Act 1859 (UK) s 30
Allen-Meyrick's Will Trusts, In re; Magnall v Allen-Meyrick [1966] 1 WLR 499 referred to Ansett Australia Ltd (No 3), Re; (2002)115 FCR 409 discussed Attorney-General at relation of Bishop of London v College of William and Mary in Virginia 1 Ves Jun 243 [30 ER 323] applied Boukydis, Re; [1927] 3 DLR 558 cited Brown, Re; (1929) 35 OWN 335 cited Burger Estate, In re; [1949] 1 WWR 280 referred to Charlotte F. Gisborne v Walter Joseph Gisborne (1872) 2 App Cas 300 cited Collins, Re; [1927] 4 DLR 770 cited Cotterell v Stratton (1872) LR 8 Ch App 295 applied Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Best & Less (Wollongong) Pty Ltd (rec & mgr apptd) (1992) 7 ACSR 245 cited Editions Tom Thompson Pty Limited v Pilley (1997) 77 FCR 141 followed Earl D. Cramer, Deceased, In the Matter of the Estate of v Surrogate's Court of New York, Onondaga County 256 NYS 2d 903 (1965) referred to Ford v The Earl of Chesterfield (No.3) 21 Bev 426 [52 ER 924] applied G B Nathan and Co Pty Ltd (in liq), Re; (1991) 24 NSWLR 674 followed Giga Investments Pty Ltd (Admin Apptd), Re (No 2) (1995) 13 ACLC 1,185 followed in part Hare v Rose 2 Ves Sen 558 [28 ER 355] applied Hicks v Wrench 6 Madd 93 [56 ER 1026] applied House of Spring Gardens Ltd v Waite [1991] 1 QB 241 cited John Gilchrist; In the matter of the Trust of the Will of (1867) 6 SCR (NSW) Eq 74 cited Jones, In re; Christmas v Jones [1897] 2 Ch 190 applied Lart, In re; Wilkinson v Blades [1896] 2 Ch 788 cited Marley v Mutual Security Merchant Bank and Trust Co Ltd [1991] 3 All ER 198 discussed Midland Land and Investment Corporation, In re; [1887] WN 58 cited Milankov Nominees Pty Ltd v Roycol Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 378 cited MTI Trading Systems Ltd v Winter [1998] BCC 591 cited Mulvaney v Rob Wintulich Pty Ltd (1995) 60 FCR 81 followed in part Odessa Promotions Pty. Ltd. (in liq), Re; Prescod v Harrison [1979] CLC 40-523 referred to Onefone Australia Pty Limited v One.Tel Ltd (In Liquidation) [2003] NSWSC 1228 cited One.Tel Networks Holdings Pty Ltd (Hallas rec and mgr), Re; (2001) 40 ACSR 83 cited Orbie Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4), Re; (1984) 8 ACLR 967 referred to Pilling, In re; Ex parte Salaman [1906] 2 KB 644 cited Pink v De Thuisey (1871)2 Madd. 155 [56 ER 292] cited Robert E. James, Deceased; In the Matter of the Estate of 208 NYS 2d 303 (1960) cited Sanderson v Classic Car Insurances Pty Ltd (1985) 10 ACLR 115 discussed Shiraz Nominees (in liq) v Collinson (1985) 10 ACLR 7 referred to Warden, Re; (1928) 34 OWN 146 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate