Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Toal v Aquarius Platinum Limited (No 2) [2004] FCA 678
COSTS – discretion to award costs – indemnity costs – circumstances under which indemnity costs may be awarded – shareholder entitled to shares under scheme of arrangement – shares not issued – cash payment tendered in lieu – disregard by respondents of applicants' rights – public interest dimension – indemnity costs awarded – amended pleadings – costs thrown away by reason of amendments awarded. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)
Federal Court of Australia Rules Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 cited re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 72 FCR 151 cited MICHAEL TOAL and GARY TOAL v AQUARIUS PLATINUM LIMITED (formerly 'Strategic Platinum Mines Limited') ARBN 087 577 893 and AQUARIUS PLATINUM (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED (formerly 'Aquarius Exploration NL' and 'Aquarius Platinum NL') N3057 of 2002 FRENCH J 25 JUNE 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY N 3057 of 2002
BETWEEN: MICHAEL TOAL
FIRST APPLICANT
GARY TOAL
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: AQUARIUS PLATINUM LIMITED
(formerly 'Strategic Platinum Mines Limited')
ARBN 087 577 893
FIRST RESPONDENT
AQUARIUS PLATINUM (AUSTRALIA) LIMITED
(formerly 'Aquarius Exploration NL' and 'Aquarius Platinum NL')
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 JUNE 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Paragraph 3 of the orders made on 4 May 2004 is varied to read as follows: '3(1) The respondents are to pay the applicants' costs of the application on an indemnity basis. 3(2) The applicants are to pay the respondents' costs thrown away by reason of the last amendments to the application and statement of claim and are to pay the respondents' costs of the preparation of their submission in that regard not including the costs of the affidavit in support thereof. 3(3) The respondents are to pay the applicants' costs of the submission for indemnity costs.' Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate