Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Matland Holdings Pty Limited v NTZ Pty Limited [2004] FCA 710 CONTRACT – Breach of collateral agreement to execute petroleum supply agreement – meaning of "collateral agreement" – whether agreement merged in conveyance – whether agreement void for incompleteness or uncertainty due to absence of price discount TRADE PRACTICES – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 51A and 52 – Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) ss 4 and 9 – Fair Trading Act 1985 (Vic) ss 10A and 11 – representation as to future matters – obligation to qualify promise – whether claim survives repeal of Fair Trading Act 1985 (Vic) –whether misleading representation made that supply agreement would be executed NEGLIGENCE – Negligent misrepresentation causing economic loss – whether duty of care owed where no vulnerability shown TRADE PRACTICES – Unconscionable conduct – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 51AA – whether any 'special disadvantage' in loss of value of business TRADE PRACTICES – Anti–competitive conduct – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 45(2), 45B, 45C(2), 47, 53A(2) of the TPA – whether petroleum supply agreement has effect of substantially lessening competition – whether agreement constitutes price fixing or exclusive dealing WORDS & PHRASES – "collateral agreement" Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 45(2), 45B, 45C(2), 47, 51A, 51AA, 52, 53A(2) Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic) ss 4, 9 Fair Trading Act 1985 (Vic) ss 10A, 11 Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic) s 14(2)(e) Petroleum Retail Marketing Franchise Act 1980 (Cth) s 17(1), 17B(4) Federal Court Rules O 4 r 3(1)(b), O 13 r 2 Wigan v Edwards (1973) 47 ALJR 586 referred to David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1992) 175 CLR 353 referred to J J Savage & Sons Pty Ltd v Blakney (1970) 119 CLR 435 referred to Hoyt's Pty Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133 referred to Heilbut, Symons & Co v Buckleton [1913] AC 30 referred to Christopoulos v Angelos (1996) 41 NSWLR 700 considered Saunders v Cockrill (1902) 87 LT (NS) 30 referred to Lawrence v Cassel [1930] 2 KB 83 referred to Dean v Gibson [1958] VR 563 applied Australasian Conference Association Ltd v Carver [1988] ANZ ConvR 516 referred to Hawkins v Gaden (1925) 37 CLR 183 applied Booker Industries Pty Ltd v Wilson Parking (Qld) Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 600 applied Australian Broadcasting Corporation v XIVth Commonwealth Games Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 540 referred to Australian & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Frost Holdings Pty Ltd [1989] VR 695 referred to British Steel Corp v Cleveland Bridge & Engineering Co Ltd [1984] 1 All ER 504 referred to Courtney & Fairbairn Ltd v Tolaini Brothers (Hotels) Ltd [1975] 1 WLR 297 referred to May & Butcher Ltd v R [1934] 2 KB 17 considered Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Ltd v Ken Morgan Motors Pty Ltd [1994] 2 VR 106 applied Vroon BV v Foster's Brewing Group Ltd [1994] 2 VR 32 considered Thorby v Goldberg (1964) 112 CLR 597 applied Dem Compagnie Pty Ltd v Telxon Australia Pty Ltd [2004] NSWCA 66 referred to Pagano v Cama (1998) 6 BPR 14,128 referred to Foley v Classique Coaches Ltd [1934] 2 KB 1 applied Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 applied Hornsby Building Information Centre Pty Ltd v Sydney Building Information Centre Ltd (1978) 140 CLR 216 applied Fried v Dixie Holdings Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1048 applied Re Ku-ring-gai Co-operative Building Society (No 12) Ltd (1978) 22 ALR 621 considered Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 applied Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459 applied Ting v Blanche (1993) 118 ALR 543 applied Phoenix Court Pty Ltd v Melbourne Central Pty Ltd (1997) ATPR (Digest) 46-179 applied Wheeler Grace & Pierucci Pty Ltd v Wright (1989) ATPR 40-940 referred to Futuretronics International Pty Ltd v Gadzhis[1992] 2 VR 217 referred to Felman v Law Institute of Victoria (1997) 150 ALR 363 referred to PSL Industries Ltd v Simplot Australia Pty Ltd [2003] VCSA 7 considered Agtrack (NT) Pty Ltd v Hatfield [2003] VCSA 6 considered Cropper v Smith (1884) 26 Ch D 700 referred to Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge "Willemstad" (1976) 136 CLR 529 referred to Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 applied Woolcock Street Investments Pty Ltd v CDG Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 16 considered Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 considered Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v C G Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (2003) 197 ALR 153 applied Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd (1994) 55 FCR 147 referred to Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority (2000) ATPR 41-752 applied John S Hayes & Associates Pty Ltd v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd (1994) ATPR 41-318 applied Outboard Marine Australia Pty Ltd v Hecar Investments (No 6) Pty Ltd (1982) ATPR 40-327 followed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate