Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AX Business Systems Pty Ltd (ACN 072 265 635) v Quality Image Pty Ltd (ACN 006 295 825) [2004] FCA 724 CORPORATIONS – statutory demand for payment of unpaid agency fees – application for review of decision of registrar refusing to set aside statutory demand – dispute as to defendant's application of moneys paid by plaintiff – running account not produced in totality – whether there is a genuine dispute as to the existence of the debt or an offsetting claim within the meaning of s 459H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): ss 459H, 459J
Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 – applied Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd (1997) 76 FCR 452 – applied Moyall Investments Services Pty Ltd v White (1993) 12 ACSR 320 – referred to Chadwick Industries (South Coast) Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporisers Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 37 – referred to Jesseron Holdings Pty Ltd v Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 122 ALR 717 – referred to Odyssey Re (Bermuda) v Reinsurance Australia (2001) 19 ACLC 987 – referred to St George Wholesale Finance Pty Ltd v Spalla (2000) 181 ALR 682 – distinguished Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 – referred to
AX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD (ACN 072 265 635) v QUALITY IMAGE PTY LTD (ACN 006 295 825) V 3089 of 2003 GOLDBERG J 15 JUNE 2004 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 3089 of 2003
BETWEEN: AX BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD
(ACN 072 265 635)
Plaintiff
AND: QUALITY IMAGE PTY LTD
(ACN 006 295 825)
Defendant
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 15 JUNE 2004
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for review of the decision of Deputy District Registrar Efthim made on 15 December 2003 be dismissed. 2. The period for compliance with the statutory demand dated 7 April 2003 served by the defendant on the plaintiff pursuant to s 459E of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) be extended to 22 June 2004. 3. The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of and incidental to the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate