Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Roberts v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCA 739 IMMIGRATION – judicial review – cancellation of visa – failure to pass character test – substantial criminal record – conspiring to import ecstasy – 15 year sentence – purported cancellation of visa by delegate – setting aside of delegate's decision by Administrative Appeals Tribunal – cancellation of visa by Minister – reference to non-existent visa in Issues Paper - permanent entry permit – deemed visa after 1 September 1994 – failure to give reasons for decision – whether decision vitiated – whether failure to consider national interest – failure to set aside Administrative Appeals Tribunal decision
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501, s 501A, s 501G, s 476(1) Migration Reform Act 1992 (Cth) s 14, s 16A, s 16B, s 17, s 18, s 43, s 46
Migration Reform (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 4 Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs Ex parte Palme (2003) 201 ALR 327 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v W157/00A (2002) 125 FCR 433 followed Nezovic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2003) 203 ALR 33 cited W157/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 190 ALR 55 cited Minister for Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Schwart [2003] FCAFC 229 applied Re Paterson; Ex parte Taylor (2001) 207 CLR 391 cited ARTHUR REGINALD ROBERTS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W225 OF 2001 FRENCH J 9 JUNE 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W225 OF 2001
BETWEEN: ARTHUR REGINALD ROBERTS
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate