Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Godley v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 774 MIGRATION – refusal of visa under s 501(1), Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – "character test" – failure to make finding that person not of good character Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 31, 65, 234(1)(b), 235(1), 501(1), 501(6), 501(6)(c), 501(G)(1)(e) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.15A(1), (2)(d), 2.01, 2.02 Income Tax Assessment Act 1939 (Cth) Dagli v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 298 cited Irving v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1996) 68 FCR 422 cited Marcel Beller Ltd v Hayden [1978] 3 All ER 111 cited Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Baker (1997) 73 FCR 187 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 cited Powell v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (1998) 98 FCR 1 cited Tuncok v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1069 cited W157/00A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2002) 190 ALR 55 cited
Shorter Oxford English Dictionary Vol 1, A-Markworthy
KARL WILLY NEVILLE GODLEY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS W2 OF 2003 LEE J 18 JUNE 2004 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W2 OF 2003
BETWEEN: KARL WILLY NEVILLE GODLEY
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LEE
DATE OF ORDER: 18 JUNE 2004
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. A writ of certiorari issue to quash the decision of the respondent made on 18 November 2002. 2. A writ of mandamus issue directing the respondent to consider and determine according to law the applicant's application for the grant of a visa under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth). 3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate